Wednesday, March 21, 2012

The Social Construction Of Knowledge

Caster Semenya
Tonight I'm just sharing a journal I wrote for class last year. Enjoy...

According to Western science, what has been discovered, researched and recorded about the natural world should be regarded as factual evidence. In Western society, science is highly respected because it is thought to be information which is "value-neutral". This means that the values of those conducting the research should not interfere with the final results of the information being collected. Science is seen as something that reveals the truth about the world, something that cannot change. Culture, on the other hand, is accepted as something which shifts and changes with humans and their values, over time and around the world. In fact, like culture, science also changes as new theories are introduced, new methods are attempted, and yet Western science sees the two worlds as completely divided. 
 
For centuries, scientists have been searching for ways to prove the supposed "inherent" differences between genders through scientific research, without acknowledging the relevant social implications of the time in which the research was being conducted. This kind of research has been done not only to prove gender differences, but also the differences between "races" and sexual orientations, amongst so many other things. Much of the information which has been collected in Western science has been done by predominately White, Western men, and of course has always been subject to their opinions, values and context. This information, taken from a single worldview, is then declared "knowledge", "fact", "truth". Ultimately it is they who would benefit from this type of research as they give themselves an opportunity to prove their superiority over whom they wish. For this reason it is especially important to know the history of science. If science is meant to be regarded as truth, yet we also know that it is not nearly as "value-neutral" as it should be, then we must carefully reconsider the "truths" which have been taught to us about our natural world. Otherwise we will continue to perpetuate simplistic understandings of human beings, while we are certainly quite the opposite. 

If you know the Caster Semenya case, you'll understand the joke I posted above and how this relates to what I wrote.

@LoveKaruna (Twitter)

No comments:

Post a Comment